Sudan in crisis

Khartoum has exploded into open warfare

April 17, 2023

Sudanese greet army soldiers, loyal to army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, in the Red Sea city of Port Sudan on April 16, 2023. - Battling fighters in Sudan said they had agreed to an hours-long humanitarian pause, including to evacuate wounded, on the second day of raging urban battles that killed more than 50 civilians including three UN staff and sparking international outcry. (Photo by AFP)
THE WARNING signs were not hard to read. For months tensions had been building between the two most powerful figures in Sudan’s military government: General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, Sudan’s de-facto leader since a coup in 2019; and Muhammad Hamdan Dagalo (better known as Hemedti), a warlord. He is the leader of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary unit that grew out of the Janjaweed militias accused of genocidal acts of murder and rape in Darfur. Many warned of an impending clash between the RSF and General Burhan’s government forces, known as the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF).
The crisis escalated sharply on the morning of April 13th, when residents of Merowe, in northern Sudan, awoke to find soldiers from the RSF rolling through town and taking up positions around the airport, a base for fighter jets. In response, SAF soldiers surrounded the RSF men and reportedly ordered them to withdraw. Soon the government warned of an imminent confrontation between the two forces, as did representatives of America, the European Union and several other Western governments. Over the next 24 hours, diplomats dashed between the two camps trying to head off a conflict. In Khartoum, Sudan’s capital, residents braced for the worst.
It came early in the morning of April 15th as fighting broke out between the SAF and RSF. Each side accused the other of shooting first. According to the national army, Mr Dagalo’s forces had launched a rebellion against the state. The RSF replied that the army had in fact launched a “sweeping attack” against its members. Mr Dagalo called his boss a “criminal” who would either be captured or “die like a dog”. Both sides claimed to have swiftly gained the upper hand.
Within hours of the first shots being fired tanks were driving through the streets of central Khartoum as fighter jets screamed overhead. As the air force bombed RSF bases, the RSF attacked the international airport; videos circulating online showed thick clouds of smoke rising from the tarmac. Clashes spread to the area around the state broadcaster and the presidential palace. Soldiers from both sides fired rockets near residential areas where civilians cowered. “We are hearing very heavy artillery,” said one resident of central Khartoum by text message. “The voices and sounds are terrifying.”
Fighting has also spread to other parts of Sudan. Almost immediately the RSF claimed to have captured the airport at Merowe. Heavy gunfire was also reported near the El Obeid airbase in the North Kordofan region, as well as in multiple locations in Darfur; three aid workers working for the UN were killed in clashes between the two armies in the city of el-Fasher. Troops were seen mobilising in towns as far from the capital as Gedaref, in Sudan’s remote and troubled east. It is still unclear whether the conflict will be limited to a brief skirmish rather than a full-scale war. Both men say they will not stop to negotiate.
Behind the latest clashes is a struggle for power between General Burhan and Mr Dagalo, and between the complex constellations of political parties, militias, rebel leaders and even foreign powers allied to them. At its heart is a fight over who will control the direction of Sudan’s political transition, which began four years ago with the overthrow of the brutal Islamist regime led by the former dictator Omar al-Bashir.
Mr Bashir was forced out of power in 2019 after months of protests led by an alliance of pro-democracy activists. Sensing Mr Bashir’s time was up, his own generals—among them General Burhan and Mr Dagalo—staged a coup to eject him. Protest leaders and the armed forces then struck a power-sharing deal which was supposed to lead to elections and a civilian government. But Mr Bashir’s divide-and-rule tactics, honed over his three decades in charge, left behind a timebomb: a motley group of militias and armed factions now jockeying for power.
The most powerful and prominent is the RSF. Mr Bashir created it as a counterweight to the army and the intelligence service, with its own command structure and funding. The man at its helm, Mr Dagalo, makes no secret of his ambition to rule.
Neither does General Burhan, who also rose to prominence under Mr Bashir and sees himself as custodian of the military’s interests, including its sprawling business empire. Sudan’s armed forces have dominated its politics since independence in 1956. Both of the country’s previous experiments in democracy—in 1964 and 1985—were crushed by it. General Burhan, who is also backed by powerful Islamist groups linked to Mr Bashir’s regime, dealt democracy its latest blow in 2021, when he carried out a second coup against the civilian leaders of a transitional government set up after the ouster of Mr Bashir. The country has been in turmoil ever since.
In December, leaders of the civilian bloc and the junta signed a provisional accord promising a fully civilian government and elections in two years. If implemented, it would help Sudan’s collapsing economy by opening the door to foreign aid and debt relief. But it would also mean the integration of the RSF into the SAF, and the creation of a single national army under civilian oversight. A final agreement was due to be signed in early April.
The prospect of a settlement appears to have hastened a showdown. Both men stand to lose from the agreement, which would reduce the power of the armed forces in politics and the economy. Loth to hand over command of his force, Mr Dagalo insisted on being given a decade to integrate the RSF into the national army (while still claiming that he supported the agreement). General Burhan is said to have wanted this to happen within two years in order to defang his rival and to ensure the pre-eminence of the SAF. More fundamentally, neither he nor the Islamist old guard around him was willing to accept any deal which significantly curtailed the SAF’s business interests. Mr Dagalo’s additional demand, in the most recent round of negotiations, that more than 800 senior officers be removed from the SAF as part of the integration process was “simply too much” for General Burhan, notes Jonas Horner, an expert on the region. Last week an Islamist official from Mr Bashir’s now-outlawed party told Reuters that their group was trying to prevent the pending deal.
Islamists within the army may therefore have decided to launch a quick strike in order to “reassert Islamist control over the transition and the country,” argues Mr Horner. In the months before the fighting broke out, both sides had steadily built up their forces and reinforced their positions in the capital and other strategic places. Tanks were spotted moving over the Nile in Khartoum. General Burhan and Mr Dagalo were said to be no longer on speaking terms in the days before the start of the fighting.
The danger of a wider conflagration is considerable. Both the SAF and the RSF have extensive ethnic and patronage networks across Sudan. The Islamists around General Burhan are especially well-entrenched in the Sudanese state and economy. The general also has the support of neighbouring Egypt. Videos released by the RSF on April 15th appeared to show captured Egyptian soldiers or pilots at the Merowe airbase.
Mr Dagalo, by contrast, is close to Issaias Afwerki, the president of Eritrea, who has a long history of meddling in the affairs of his neighbours. Mr Dagalo previously counted Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates among his patrons, after he sent his forces to aid their war in Yemen, meaning the RSF may have been equipped by them. The national force, though, controls the skies, which is why Mr Dagalo’s men seem to have concentrated on seizing Sudan’s airfields.
The fighting could also spell the end for Sudan’s troubled but once hopeful transition to democracy. As two armies duke it out, ordinary Sudanese are caught in the crossfire. At least 27 civilians were reportedly killed and more than 400 injured in the first day of fighting. “We don’t back either side,” says Ahmed Ismat, a protest leader in Khartoum. “Any war means the end of the revolution.”